Plaintiffs obtained a loan from defendant while it was an illegally unlicensed lender in California. This decision holds that plaintiffs lack standing to sue defendant for violating the UCL in making the loan while unlicensed since plaintiffs suffered no loss of money or property due to the defendant's unlicensed status. They received the exact loan terms for which they had… Read More
Ford removed this action to federal court under CAFA, then successfully moved to dismiss it under Rule 12(b)(6) because the plaintiff did not allege he had suffered an injury to his business, his person, or his reputation as required by the Washington privacy statute under which he sued. On appeal, plaintiff argued that the lack of injury showed he did… Read More
After Habelt filed a class action for securities fraud against iRhythm, Miss. Public Retirement System was appointed the class representative pursuant to the PSLRA. The Retirement System's amended complaint was dismissed without leave to amend. The Retirement System did not appeal from the dismissal. The mere fact that Habelt remained a name in the case caption didn't confer standing on… Read More
The collateral source rule cannot be used to confer UCL standing on a plaintiff who has suffered no economic injury from the alleged unfair competition but whose insurer paid more as a result. Here, plaintiff alleged that Genentech sole a drug in too big doses that ended up wasting the expensive drug. Plaintiff conceded he would have paid the same… Read More
Corp. Code 5142 and 5223 provide that a director of a nonprofit corporation may sue to enjoin a breach of the charitable trust and/or to remove another director fraudulent or dishonest acts, gross abuse of authority, or breach of duty. This decision holds that since the two statutes do not use the instituted or maintained" language used in Corp. Code… Read More
Except when a statute granting the right to an attorney fee award itself provides a basis for federal question jurisdiction, a district court lacks jurisdiction to award the defendant attorney fees after dismissing the complaint for lack of Article III standing. Read More
Fire insurance policies must be written on the statutory form that includes a one-year from inception of loss (semi-contractual) statute of limitations. This decision holds that the insured cannot circumvent that limitations provision by bringing suit under the UCL for an injunction against denial of insurance coverage under similar circumstances. To have standing to sue under the UCL, the plaintiff… Read More
Applying Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal. 5th 1130 to an at-will employment contract, this decision holds that to assert a tort claim for inducing breach of the contract, the plaintiff must allege independently wrongful conduct. Here, plaintiff could not do so. He lacked antitrust standing to rely on the antitrust violation that he had alleged as… Read More
To have standing to sue for an antitrust violation, the plaintiff must allege an injury arising from the aspect of the alleged antitrust violation that causes the evil at which the antitrust laws are aimed; namely, a reduction in competition. Here, the alleged violation was a pre-merger agreement between the merging entities not to compete for each other's customers before… Read More
A successor owner of the property is entitled to reinstate a defaulted deed of trust under Civ. Code 2924c even if the successor owner is not a party to the defaulted loan and deed of trust and does not assume any obligation under that loan and deed of trust. Here, plaintiff bought the property at a foreclosure sale held by… Read More
This decision holds that an unsecured creditor that was the chair of the committee of unsecured creditors in East Coast's Chapter 11 proceeding lacked Article III standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court's order awarding the Chapter 11 trustee the maximum allowable fees. The confirmed Chapter 11 plan provided for the debtor's reorganization and full payment of all allowed claims,… Read More
A taxpayer has standing to sue under CCP 526a to challenge a government program on the ground it is unconstitutional either on its face or as applied, at least if the as-applied challenge is broadly based, not confined to an aberrant application to one individual or a small group. The taxpayer may bring the suit without having to identify any… Read More
Reaching the same result as Galarsa v. Dolgen California, LLC (2023) 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 129, this decision holds that plaintiff's individual PAGA claims (i.e., those which are based on Lab. Code violations affecting the plaintiff) must be arbitrated. However, representative PAGA claims based on Lab. Code violations affecting only employees other than the plaintiff are not subject to arbitration,… Read More
A plaintiff claiming loss or damage to its cannabis business cannot bring a federal RICO suit against the defendant causing that damage. Though legal under California law, a cannabis business is illegal under federal law and so cannot be recognized as "business or property" injury to which might confer statutory standing t sue for a RICO violation. Read More
Though not limited by US Const. Art. III case or controversy standing requirements, California court apply prudential standing requirements. Absent a statutory grant of standing to represent the general public, a plaintiff must generally show that he has a beneficial interest in the claim he pursues. A statute like FCRA that allows for statutory damages that are intended to compensate… Read More
Patients sued medical group after the group suffered a data breach that allowed hackers access to personal indentifying information concerning patients, including SSNs and medical histories. This decision holds that the patients have UCL standing to sue. Under their "benefit of the bargain" theory, the patients suffered a loss of money by purchasing the medical group's services which (a) weren't… Read More
A defaulted defendant (or in this case, one against whom terminating discovery sanctions had been entered) may, nevertheless, move for a new trial on the ground that the court made an “error in law” in calculating damages. Even a defaulting defendant may appeal the resulting default judgment on the grounds that the damages award (1) “is so disproportionate to the… Read More
On remand after reversal of an order dismissing the complaint (Sicre De Fontbrune v. Wolfsy (9th Cir. 2016) 838 F.3d 992), this decision reverses a summary judgment in defendant's favor refusing to enforce a French judgment for "astreinte" damages for using photos of Picasso paintings infringing plaintiff's copyright in the photos. The French judgment that plaintiff sought to enforce was… Read More
In this PAGA suit, the original plaintiff died while the suit was pending. This decision holds that the trial court correctly denied a different employee's motion to intervene in the action in place of the deceased plaintiff because the would-be plaintiff was not an employee at the time the original plaintiff sent her complaint to the DLSE and therefore would… Read More
Plaintiff, a Russian citizen residing in Russia, obtained an arbitration award against defendant, a Russian citizen residing in California. Plaintiff domesticated the arbitration award, securing a judgment against defendant in a federal district court in California so that plaintiff could execute on defendant's California assets. Thereafter, defendant engaged in a series of complex domestic and foreign efforts to shelter his… Read More
