Wins Unanimous Defense Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice Action
Joel Halverson and Johanna Berta won a defense verdict on behalf of a registered nurse and her employer in a case alleging medical malpractice and medical battery in the Alameda County Superior Court. The plaintiff, who was wheelchair-bound since birth with cerebral palsy and admitted to the hospital in the time in question for assessment and management of pain in… Read More
Contractual defense and indemnity obtained in cases following early and aggressive tenders.
Colin and his colleagues are successful in their relentless efforts to obtain defense and indemnification for clients arising out of contract. Read More
Voluntary dismissals obtained in multiple cases on behalf of clients in the farm, ranching and agriculture industries.
From the outset of pre-litigation and litigation assignments, Colin and his colleagues attempt to obtain the necessary information through informal investigation and discovery to diminish client exposure to liability and damages. As a secondary benefit, their efforts resulted in savings of (at least) hundreds of thousands of dollars in defense fees and costs. Read More
Favorable settlement entered for a “nuisance value amount” after revelation of plaintiff and his/her attorney’s discovery abuse.
Nominal settlement entered after several rounds of first and third-party discovery revealed witness and document tampering by plaintiff and his/her attorney. Read More
Favorable settlement in negligence action arising from an automobile accident with alleged damages exceeding $5 million.
Favorable settlement in wrongful death arising from automobile accident. Read More
Sacramento Superior Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Loan Servicer and Investor
Plaintiff alleged causes of action for promissory estoppel, negligence, fraud, breach of contract, and wrongful foreclosure against a mortgage loan servicer and loan investor. The claims were based on two different theories, that the servicer misapplied the HAMP guidelines and improperly denied plaintiff for a HAMP modification, and that the servicer orally promised to change the terms of a different… Read More
Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment Motion By Mortgage Servicer On Loan Modification Claims
A court in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California granted a summary judgment motion by national bank acting as loan servicer. Plaintiff alleged causes of action for negligence and violation of California Business Professions Code section 17200, and the claims were based on allegations that the bank was negligent in its review of multiple loan modification applications from… Read More
Summary Judgment Granted in Favor of Mortgage Servicer, Investor, and Trustee
A court in Santa Clara County Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of a mortgage servicer, investor, and trustee on nine causes of action in which the plaintiff alleged the loan promissory note and deed of trust were void and therefore the defendants did not have authority because the loan was “table-funded.” Read More
Bank Prevails on Summary Judgment on Loan Modification Claims
In Santa Clara County Superior Court, plaintiffs raised causes of action against a national bank acting as a mortgage loan servicer for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and breach of contract. Plaintiffs alleged that the bank mislead them into applying for a loan modification which was not possible, and… Read More
Investor and Mortgage Loan Servicer Prevail in Jury Trial In Alameda Superior Court
A jury in Alameda Superior Court awarded a mortgage loan investor the damages it sought under two different theories raised in a cross-complaint after the former borrower wrongfully continued to possess the property and defy the eviction process for years after the lawful foreclosure was completed. Earlier, on successful demurrers and a motion for summary adjudication, the court dismissed numerous… Read More
Mortgage Servicer Prevails on Summary Judgment on Wrongful Foreclosure Claims
In San Mateo County Superior Court, the court granted summary judgment in favor of a mortgage servicer on a wrongful foreclosure claim involving compliance with the California statutory mailing requirements. Earlier, on successive demurrers, the court dismissed plaintiff’s causes of action for wrongful foreclosure based on alleged “dual tracking,” negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and intentional infliction of emotional… Read More
Favorable settlement in products liability action for client manufacturer.
Favorable settlement entered for a “nuisance value amount” after filing for summary judgment and before plaintiff filed opposition brief. Read More
Favorable settlement in wrongful death action.
Favorable settlement entered for a “nuisance value amount” after filing for summary judgment and before plaintiff filed opposition brief. Read More
Favorable settlement in strict and negligent product liability action arising from a worksite death with alleged damages exceeding $20 million.
Favorable settlement in wrongful death action. Read More
Defense judgment obtained for university and nation sporting organization program based on waiver and assumption of risk in gross negligence action involving alleged traumatic brain injury.
Summary judgment granted in favor of defendants in gross negligence action involving alleged TBI to a minor. Read More
Defense judgment obtained for contractor in negligence action involving alleged property and business interruption damages brought by owner of a medical care facility.
Summary judgment granted in favor of client contractor in negligence action. Read More
California Homeowner’s Bill of Rights Trial Victory for Firm
Severson & Werson attorneys Joseph W. Guzzetta and Laszlo Ladi prevailed in a trial of multiple claims of violation of the California Homeowners’ Bill of Rights in a three-week jury trial in San Mateo County Superior Court. Mr. Guzzetta and Mr. Ladi represented a major national bank in a trial of claims that the bank, acting as loan servicer, had… Read More
Severson & Werson Attorney Wins Two Trials In Three Weeks
Financial services attorney Andrew Noble delivered back-to-back victories to residential mortgage servicers at recent trials. On February 6, 2018, a jury reached a verdict for the servicer in a trial at the U.S. District Court for Northern California where the borrower alleged the servicer had mishandled a series of monthly payments. Three weeks to the date earlier, a Jefferson County,… Read More