The trial court erred in instructing the jury that a manufacturer remained liable on its limited new car warranty well after the mileage or temporal limits had expired so long as the defect had been reported during the warranty's duration and had not been "fixed." Instead, CACI 3231 correctly summarizes Civ. Code 1795.6, which extends the warranty period only if… Read More
An employer violates Lab. Code 512 and Wage Order No. 4 if it rounds actual clock in and out times for workers to the nearest 10th or 4th of an hour in calculating their meal and rest break periods--this is true even if (a question that the Supreme Court has not resolved) a similar policy of rounding hours for beginning… Read More
The dormant Commerce Clause does not prohibit California from applying its labor laws to airline employees who reside or are employed predominantly in California. The airline's block time method of computing pay was similar to the pay scheme approved in Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 762, and so did not offend California Labor Code guarantees of… Read More
After sending plaintiff a 998 offer to settle the entire case for $250,000, defendant sent plaintiff another offer, not under 998, to pay $191,000 on the contract claim, plus attorney fees, leaving the Civ. Code 3344 claim for trial. Plaintiff accepted the second offer and later dismissed the Civ. Code 3344 claim. Held, the second offer revoked the 998 offer,… Read More
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that the defendant was not the prevailing party entitled to an attorney fee award under Civ. Code 3344 when the plaintiff dismissed its section 3344 claim without prejudice so that it could refile that claim (which it did) in Tennessee, whose law the trial court had held applied. Civ. Code… Read More
The trial court erred in granting defendants' Anti-SLAPP motion to strike this malicious prosecution case. The evidence adduced on the motion showed that plaintiff had a probability of success in establishing the elements of the malicious prosecution claim. The dismissal of the underlying action for lack of prosecution was potentially a favorable termination on the merits. The original plaintiff was… Read More
A defendant can be held liable for negligent misrepresentation on two disparate theories. First, under Rest.2d Torts section 311, a defendant may be liable for negligent misrepresentation in endorsing a product that physically harms the plaintiff. (See Hanberry v. Hearst Corp. (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 680.) Here, plaintiff suffered no physical injury and so couldn't rely on that theory to pursue… Read More
The federal Poultry and Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 451 et seq.) expressly preempts state laws that impose different or additional labeling requirements to the labels approved by the Secretary of Agriculture under the PPIA. (21 U.S.C. 467e.) This decision holds that the federal statute preempts any state law claim that the federally approved label for a poultry… Read More
The Fair Housing Amendments Act (42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B) prohibits discrimination in the form of “a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford [a disabled] person an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Here, a disabled person was a month-to-month tenant. The landlord offered him a… Read More
Having secured a default judgment against the contractor that build a retaining wall on adjacent property which collapsed damaging plaintiff's property, plaintiff sued the contractor's general liability insurer. This decision holds that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment in the insurer's favor. The insurance policy was an occurrence policy. With a continuing loss, coverage attaches when the damage… Read More
An arbitration clause that stated both parties waived the right to bring a class action, act as a private attorney general or join claims of other persons in arbitration or in court did not offend McGill. At least given the 9th Circuit's view that the FAA preempts Broughton and Cruz, the arbitrator could award public injunctive relief since McGill makes… Read More
Following n Hill v. Superior Court (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 1281 and Kerley v. Weber (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 1187, and disagreeing with Levin v. Winston-Levin (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1025, this decision holds that double damages may be awarded under Probate Code 859 without a finding of bad faith if the defendant has taken or concealed property of a dependent adult, a… Read More
Plaintiff contracted mesothelioma, allegedly from asbestos-concrete pipe manufactured by defendant, a successor to Johns Manville's asbestos-concrete business. A $15 million punitive damage award is reversed for lack of evidence that an officer, director or managing agent of defendant acted with malice, oppression or fraud or authorized or ratified any conduct. Romo v. Ford Motor Co. (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1115 doesn't… Read More
Brown, a teacher, complained that the electro-magnetic waves emanating from the new wi-fi system installed in her school caused her chronic pain, headaches, nausea, itching, burning sensations on her skin, ear issues, shortness of breath, inflammation, heart palpitations, respiratory complications, foggy headedness, and fatigue. She reported her symptoms to the school, which initially gave her the option of having it… Read More
The Biomaterials Access Assurance Act (“BAAA”), 21 U.S.C. § 1602(1)(A) immunized defendant, the manufacturer of a portion of a hip replacement prosthesis from liability that arose when a portion of the prosthesis supplied by defendant broke after implantation, requiring a new surgery and replacement. The act provides immunity for those supplying parts of a human implant. Read More
A PAGA suit under Lab. Code 2988 may be brought against the employer in any county in which an aggrieved employee worked and a Labor Code violation was allegedly committed. The private plaintiff need not bring the action in the county in which he worked or where the violations against him occurred. Read More
Deputy sheriffs arrested Collins, thinking he was drunk and interrupted the paramedics' review of his medical condition. When Collins was finally seen by a doctor, he was misdiagnosed. As a result of the poor medical treatment, Collins suffered extensive injuries. This decision holds that (1) despite having probable cause to arrest Collins, the deputies can be liable in negligence for… Read More
A release that ratepayers were required to sign in order to obtain a partial rebate of illegal water charges was enforceable. The city did not fraudulently conceal facts from ratepayers. Its FAQs said the partial refund was due to the statute of limitations barring claims for any greater refund and revealed that the overcharges had been assessed for a longer… Read More
Civil Code section 1668 is meant to prohibit contracts releasing liability for future torts not to prohibit settlements of disputes relating to past conduct. Accord: Watkins v. Wachovia Corp. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1576, 1587, fn. 12. Read More
Under CCP 1281.91(b), a party has an absolute right to disqualify a neutral arbitrator (once) without cause if done within 15 days of the arbitrator's providing the parties the disclosures required by CCP 1281.9. This decision holds that the right to peremptorily disqualify a neutral arbitrator under section 1281.91 is not waivable in advance so that defendant could disqualify the… Read More
