Following Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Mendes (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 136, this decision holds that parents and their children who attended Sonoma Academy did not have standing to sue the school under the UCL for not disclosing that the school had harbored child sex abusers for many years as employees and staff. The children were not abused themselves, and neither parents nor children were aware abuse was occurring when the children attended the Academy. The children got what the parents bargained and paid for–an abuse-free education. They couldn’t show monetary injury by claiming they would have sent their children to a different school if the abuse had been disclosed. An abuse-free school environment wasn’t part of the bargain the parents made with the school, unlike in Kwikset, where the label said “Made in America” and it thus became part of the purchasers’ bargain.