On the same day IQ received a letter from plaintiff stating that all future communications regarding his debt should be sent only to his attorney, IQ sent plaintiff (not his attorney) a debt validation letter. Doing so violated the FDCPA (15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(2)). This decision holds that the plaintiff has Article III standing to sue even without a showing of any actual damage other than receipt of the letter. Congress has given consumers the right to sue in this circumstance. And, the unwanted mail claim is closely analogous to the traditional common law tort of invasion of privacy by intrusion on seclusion.