On a prior appeal, the Court of Appeal had held that a plaintiff in his own PAGA suit may intervene in another plaintiff’s PAGA action against the same employer to challenge the fairness of the settlement. On remand, the trial court approved a somewhat modified PAGA settlement over Moniz’s objection. She appealed again. This time, the Court of Appeal holds that the intervening decision in Turrietta v. Lyft, Inc. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 664 deprived Moniz of standing to challenge the fairness of the settlement in the other plaintiff’s PAGA suit. Accordingly, it dismisses Moniz’s appeal from the judgment approving that settlement.