Following Koebke v. Bernardo Heights Country Club (2005) 36 Cal.4th 824, this decision holds that the Unruh Act does not prohibit disparate impact discrimination. So, having a website that is not specially adapted to be readable by the vision-impaired is not an independent violation of the Unruh Act, even if the business is aware that its website can’t be read by the blind and does nothing to cure that problem. The decision also holds that maintaining such a website, at least if not connected with a physical store, is not a “place of public accommodation” so that the federal ADA does not apply and does not require the website owner to make the site readable by the blind.