Defendant’s arbitration agreement required arbitration of all claims and limited the arbitrator’s ability to award a public injunction by stating that relief could be awarded only in favor of the individual party seeking relief.  That limitation was unenforcable under McGill v. Citibank, N.A. (2017) 2 Cal.5th 945, but though unenforceable, the limitation was not unconscionable.  See Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co., 846 F.3d 1251, 1264 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding provision barring PAGA claims to be unenforceable but not substantively unconscionable).