A permanent injunction may not be issued unless the plaintiff pleads and proves a case warranting that extraordinary equitable relief. A complaint that pleads only a claim for declaratory relief is insufficient to support the issuance of a permanent injunction. And proof sufficient for declaratory relief does not automatically entitle the plaintiff to a permanent injunction. That is true even of instances in which the court has found that a statute facially violated the First Amendment. Ordinarily, a declaratory judgment so stating will suffice to prevent future enforcement of the unconstitutional statute. Here, however, the DOJ was equivocal in response to questions in the trial court and on appeal as to whether it would attempt to enforce the unconstitutional law against non-parties to the present action. So the case is remanded to the trial court to determine whether to permit an amendment to state a claim for an injunction, and if so, whether to issue one.