During these challenging times, Severson & Werson remains open and in full operation, consistent with the firm’s previously established contingency planning. While many of our attorneys and staff will be working remotely, as a firm, we continue in full operation. We are here to help, as always.

Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

Firm Profile

Upjohn Privilege

Subscribe to Consumer Finance

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Consumer Finance Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

District Court (Ohio) Says Data Breach Response Information in Sonic Hack Won’t Be Sealed Because of Interest to the Public (and the Court)

by Scott J. Hyman |

In In re Sonic Corp. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig. Fin. Insts., No. 1:17-md-2807, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142001, at *5-6 (N.D. Ohio July 30, 2021), Judge Gwin refused to seal some of the data breach investigation from the Sonic data breach hack. In 2017, unidentified third parties accessed Sonic customers' payment card data. The hackers obtained customer payment card… Read More

District Court (D.C.) Says Law Firm’s Investigation into Cybersecurity Breach Not Protected from Discovery by Privilege; Orders Production of Effect of Hack on Law Firm’s Other Clients

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Wengui v. Clark Hill, Civil Action No. 19-3195 (JEB), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5395 (D.D.C. Jan. 12, 2021), Judge B0asberg ordered production of internal investigation reports regarding a cybersecurity breach, which were not protected by the attorney client or work product privileges. Malicious cyberattacks have unfortunately become a routine part of our modern digital world. So have the lawsuits… Read More

District Court (Va.) Finds that Company’s Data Breach Consultant’s Report Was Not Entitled to Work Product Protection

by Scott J. Hyman |

In In re Capital One Consumer Data Sec. Breach Litig., No. 1:19md2915 (AJT/JFA), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91736, at *5-9 (E.D. Va. May 26, 2020), Judge Anderson found that a consultant's report prepared in connection with a data breach was not entitled to work product protection and must be turned over to the Plaintiffs. The facts were as follows: On… Read More