Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

Human Intervention

Subscribe to Consumer Finance

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Consumer Finance Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

In Mauer v. American Intercontinental University, Inc., 2016 WL 4651395, at *4 (N.D.Ill., 2016), Judge Ellis allowed a TCPA case past the pleading stage based on a plea of a "pause" to demonstrate absence of human intervention. Here, Mauer alleges that when she answered the call from John Doe, “there was a noticeable pause before the representative came on the… Read More

In Smith v. Aitima Medical Equipment, Inc., here,  Judge Birotte dismissed a TCPA claim based on lack of Art. III standing.  In Szumilas v. CBE Group, LLC., here, however, Judge Birotte found Art. III standing in a TCPA case.  The difference between the two outcomes seemed to be the volume of the calls.   Read More

In Saragusa v. Countrywide, 2016 WL 1059004, at *4 (E.D.La., 2016), Judge Vance found that a TCPA plaintiff had pleaded no facts suggesting that the calls were not manually dialed. The TCPA defines the “automatic telephone dialing system” as equipment capable of “stor[ing] or produc[ing] telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator [and] dial[ing] such… Read More

In Schlotfeldt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 2016 WL 406341, at *5 (N.D.Ill., 2016), Judge Gettlemen dismissed a TCPA case because Plaintiff did not plead adequate "use" of an ATDS. As evidenced from the cases cited by each party, courts in this district are split concerning what is required to state a claim under the TCPA. See Martin v. Direct… Read More

In Luna v. SHAC, LLC dba Sapphire Gentlemen's Club, here, Judge Lloyd granted summary judgment to a TCPA defendant who was accused of violating the TCPA for sending text messages to customers. Shac operates the Sapphire Gentlemen’s Club in Las Vegas, Nevada. Shac engaged CallFire, a third-party mobile marketing company, to provide a web-based platform (here, EXTexting.com) for sending promotional text messages to… Read More

In Rouse v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 2015 WL 4636726 (D.Minn.,2015), Judge Magnuson held that a TCPA Text-Message Plaintiff survived a Motion to Dismiss on whether the Complaint adequately pleaded use of an ATDS.  The facts were as follows: In late 2014, Plaintiff Kevin Rouse received a text message on his personal cell phone from Defendant Delta Air Lines, asking… Read More

In McKenna v. WhisperText, 2015 WL 428728 (N.D.Cal. 2015), Judge Grewal found that a TCPA plaintiff pleaded himself out of a TCPA claim because there was no allegation of an absence of human intervention. A little over a year ago, Plaintiff Tony McKenna got a text he did not expect from “16502412157.” The text was an invitation to download the… Read More

In Morse v. Allied Interstate, LLC, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7004036 (M.D.Pa. 2014),  Judge Nealon granted Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on a TCPA case, finding that the defendant had used an ATDS. Here, the parties agree there was no human intervention at the time the calls were placed. The calls were made without a human contemporaneously dialing the number… Read More

Yes, you read it right. In Gragg v. Orange Cab Co., Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 494862 (W.D.Wash. 2014), Judge Lasnik held that a TCPA did not use an ATDS within the meaning of the TCPA.  The facts were as follows: Defendant Orange Cab Company, Inc. (Orange Cab) utilizes TaxiMagic, a Ridecharge, Inc. product, as a means of remaining… Read More