Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

EFTA

Subscribe to Consumer Finance

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Consumer Finance Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

In Foreman v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 18-cv-01375-BLF, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136743 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2019), Judge Freeman addressed the propriety of a “stop payment” fee imposed by a bank on a consumer who wishes to stop EFT payments. This case involves a consumer's right to authorize his bank to transfer funds electronically to third parties through… Read More

In Foreman v. Bank of America, 2018 WL 6421873, at *1 (N.D.Cal., 2018), Judge Freeman dismissed an EFTA case based, in part, on the purported charging of stop-payment fees. This case involves a consumer's right to authorize his bank to transfer funds electronically to third parties through what is aptly named an “electronic fund transfer.” Such transfers are governed by the… Read More

In Salls v. Digital Federal Credit Union, 2018 WL 5846820 (D.Mass., 2018), Judge Hillman allowed an EFTA claim to proceed against a Credit Union. Brandi Salls (“Plaintiff”) brings a putative class action challenging the practice of Digital Federal Credit Union and DOES 1 through 100 (“Defendant”) to charge overdraft fees when members accounts have sufficient funds to cover the transactions.… Read More

In McClellon v. Capital One Bank, N.A., 2018 WL 5240528, at *3–4 (W.D.Wash., 2018), Judge Coughenour dismissed an EFTA Plaintiff's claims based on claimed duties not required by Reg. E/EFTA. The implementing regulations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1693, et seq., commonly known as “Regulation E,” broadly deal with the “basic rights, liabilities, and responsibilities… Read More

In White v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 2017 WL 1131898, at *2–6 (E.D.N.C., 2017), Judge Britt held that an FCBA claim could proceed past the pleadings stage but an EFTA claim could not.  The Plaintiff adequately pleaded an FCBA claim. Plaintiff first alleges that Chase violated the billing dispute procedures contained in the FCBA because it failed to conduct a… Read More

In Park v. Webloyalty.com, Inc., 2017 WL 1149516, at *1–2 (C.A.9 (Cal.), 2017), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said the following facts gave rise to a proper EFTA claim.  "After Kevin Park bought a gift certificate for his minor son Matthew from Gamestop.com, he saw a coupon for $10.00 on the Gamestop.com purchase confirmation page. He clicked… Read More

In Blatt v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., 2017 WL 660677, at *3–4 (M.D.Tenn., 2017), Judge Sharp granted summary judgment to an automobile finance company on a Plaintiff's EFTA claim. First, Blatt claims that his authorization over the phone does not equate to written authorization as contemplated in the EFTA. (Docket No. 38 at 4). Blatt acknowledges that the EFTA… Read More

In Kleiner v. Earthlink, Inc., 2017 WL 345525, at *1 (E.D.Cal., 2017), Judge Orrick denied a motion to dismiss an EFTA claim.  The facts were as follows. Around December 2015, Linda Kleiner called EarthLink to purchase internet services. Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. No. 1) ¶ 9. During this call, she learned that EarthLink's “services were a ‘dial-up’ type internet” and told… Read More

In Ramirez v. Baxter Credit Union, 2017 WL 118859, at *2 (N.D.Cal., 2017), Judge Illston dismissed an EFTA class action.  The facts were as follows: This dispute, and others like it, hinge on how a financial institution calculates accountholders' account balances when determining whether an overdraft has occurred, and whether the institution adequately informs accountholders of these overdraft practices. A… Read More