Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

Firm Profile

CEB Prac. Guide § 2A.11 -- Persons to Whom the FDCPA Apply -- Federal -- Debt Assignees

Subscribe to Consumer Finance

Thank you for your desire to subscribe to Severson & Werson’s Consumer Finance Weblog. In order to subscribe, you must provide a valid name and e-mail address. This too will be retained on our server. When you push the “subscribe button”, we will send an electronic mail to the address that you provided asking you to confirm your subscription to our Weblog. By pushing the “subscribe button”, you represent and warrant that you are over the age of 18 years old, are the owner/authorized user of that e-mail address, and are entitled to receive e-mails at that address. Our weblog will retain your name and e-mail address on its server, or the server of its web host. However, we won’t share any of this information with anyone except the Firm’s employees and contractors, except under certain extraordinary circumstances described on our Privacy Policy and (About The Consumer Finance Blog/About the Appellate Tracker Weblog) Page. NOTICE AND AGREEMENT REGARDING E-MAILS AND CALLS/TEXT MESSAGES TO LAND-LINE AND WIRELESS TELEPHONES: By providing your contact information and confirming your subscription in response to the initial e-mail that we send you, you agree to receive e-mail messages from Severson & Werson from time-to-time and understand and agree that such messages are or may be sent by means of automated dialing technology. If you have your email forwarded to other electronic media, including text messages and cellular telephone by way of VoIP, internet, social media, or otherwise, you agree to receive my messages in that way. This may result in charges to you. Your agreement and consent also extend to any other agents, affiliates, or entities to whom our communications are forwarded. You agree that you will notify Severson & Werson in writing if you revoke this agreement and that your revocation will not be effective until you notify Severson & Werson in writing. You understand and agree that you will afford Severson & Werson a reasonable time to unsubscribe you from the website, that the ability to do so depends on Severson & Werson’s press of business and access to the weblog, and that you may still receive one or more emails or communications from weblog until we are able to unsubscribe you.

California’s 2022 Validation Requirements for Assignees of Delinquent Debt

by Scott J. Hyman |

That California legislature last year passed last year SB 531, which became effective July 1, 2022, imposing additional validation requirements on certain debt collectors under the Rosenthal Act.  The bill was designed to do as follows: This bill would require a debt collector to which delinquent debt, as defined and specified, has been assigned to provide to the debtor, upon… Read More

8th Cir. Says Debt Buyer is Subject to FDCPA Post-Henson; Says Debt Buyer Might Not Be Vicariously Liable for Activities of Debt Collector It Hired

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Reygadas v. DNF Assocs., LLC, No. 19-3167, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 38989 (8th Cir. Dec. 14, 2020), the Court of Appeals held that a debt buyer was subject to the FDCPA. Emphasizing that the Supreme Court in Henson overruled the so-called "default test," DNF argues that the debt buyer is a creditor -- a person "to whom a debt… Read More

District Court (Cal.) Says Car Rental for Business Trip Had Enough “Personal” Components to It To Defeat Debt Collector’s MSJ; Debt was in Default at the Time of Assignment

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Denicolo v. Hertz Corp., No. 19-cv-00210-YGR, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181248 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2020), Judge Rogers denied a debt collector’s MSJ arising out of a rental car contract  arising from a debtor’s business trip. In Chyba, defendant claimed that plaintiff had incurred damage to a rental vehicle and that summary judgment on the FDCPA claim should be… Read More

District Court (Ind.) Says “Early Out” Debt Servicer Was Not a Debt Collector Under FDCPA Because Account Was Not In “Default”

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Wagoner v. Npas, Inc., No. 3:18-CV-520 DRL-MGG, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73381 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 27, 2020), Judge Leichty granted summary judgment under the FDCPA to an ‘early out’ debt servicer. NPAS serves as an "early-out" collector and extended business office for healthcare systems. A company hired to service the debt of another—i.e., send bills and collect routine payments—falls… Read More

Court of Appeal (Cal.) Says Borrower Stated FDCPA Claim Against Mortgage Servicer Where Debt Already Was In Default at the Time of Assignment

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Randall v. Ditech Financial, LLC., 2018 WL 2355927, at *3 (Cal.App. 4 Dist., 2018), the California Court of Appeal found that an FDCPA Plaintiff stated a claim against a mortgage servicer who accepted assignment of a loan that already was in default. Here, the complaint alleged Ditech “collects debts, either on behalf of itself or others, in the regular… Read More

District Court (Tenn.) Says Auto Finance Company Not Subject to FDCPA Where It Introduced Evidence that Account Was Not In Default at the Time of Assignment

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Simpson v. American Credit Acceptance, LLC, 2017 WL 1968284, at *3–4 (E.D.Tenn., 2017), Judge Guyton granted summary judgment to an auto finance company under the FDPCA because the account was not in default at the time of the assignment. The Defendant asserts that it is not subject to the FDCPA because it is not a debt collector. Further, the… Read More

Uh, Thanks 11th Circuit, I Guess: 11th Cir. Confirms that FDCPA Does Not Apply to Debts Not In Default at the Time of the Assignment, But, Says Spokeo Provides Standing in FDCPA “Bad Letter” Case Because Debtor’s “Concrete Injury” Was Not Receiving FDCPA Disclosures

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Church v. Accretive Health, Inc., here, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that collection on a debt that was not in default at the time of the assignment does not trigger the FDCPA. Thus, if the debt at issue was not in default at the time it was obtained by a third party agency, the agency’s… Read More

District Court (Ga.) Finds that Entity Acquiring Portfolio of Current and Defaulted Debt is Not Subject to FDCPA

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Davidson v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 2014 WL 4071891 (N.D.Ga. 2014), Judge Duffey held that an entity that acquires a portfolio with both current and defaulted debt is not subject to the FDCPA as to those loans in the portfolio that were in default at the time of the purchase. Judge Duffey held that 15 USC 1692a(6)’s application… Read More

4th Cir. Distinguishes Between Delinquent Accounts and Accounts “in Default” at the time of Assignment under the FDCPA

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Fontell v. Hassett, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 2464987 (4th Cir. 2014), the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit distinguished between “default” and mere “delinquency” in determining, under the FDCPA,  whether an account was “in default” at the time it was obtained. Excluded from the FDCPA's definition of debt collectors, see 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(6) is “any person… Read More

District Court (Miss.) Requires FDCPA Plaintiff to Plead Each Element of FDCPA Definition of “Debt Collector”

by Scott J. Hyman |

In Hambrick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2009 WL 1532676 (N.D.Miss. 2009), Judge Pepper required a Plaintiff to plead each element of the definition of “debt collector”, denying the Plaintiff the right to conduct discovery in order to be able to plead one of the elements.  The issue involved whether, when Wells Fargo took assignment of the debt, the debt… Read More