Because the University of Southern California’s disciplinary procedures did not adequately allow for the accused student to cross-examine victim in a rape case, it denied fundamental fairness, and a subsequent disciplinary decision had to be overturned. Read More
USC denied an accused student due process in disciplinary proceedings since the decision maker did not observe the complaining witness in person (or by video hookup) to assess her credibility. Read More
A university owes its students a duty of care to protect them against foreseeable harm while engaged in activities related to the university’s delivery of educational services. Read More
Student accused of sexual assault was denied basic due process by university disciplinary board by withholding evidence of antidepressant drugs being taken by the victim until the last minute and barring accused student’s attorney from participating in the proceedings while allowing university’s own counsel to act in a prosecutorial role. Read More
Substantial evidence supported finding by the university that a student had cheated on a biology exam, and since this determination was moreover made by a fair procedure, the trial court incorrectly granted the student’s administrative mandamus petition. Read More
