Effective, Experienced, Exceptional.

Consumer Finance

Subscribe to Consumer Finance

In Piontek v. IC System, Inc. 2009 WL 1044596 (M.D.Pa. 2009), Judge Rambo held that a Plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages put at issue other lawsuits she had filed.    Here, Plaintiff's motivation for her actions giving rise to the suit, or for bringing the suit, are irrelevant to the issue of whether Defendants violated the FDCPA through their dealings… Read More

In Fairbanks v. Superior Court, 2009 WL 1035264 (2009), the California Supreme Court held that life insurance is neither a “good” nor a “service” subject to the CLRA.  The Supreme Court explained:    The Consumers Legal Remedies Act defines “goods” as “tangible chattels bought or leased for use primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, including certificates or coupons exchangeable for… Read More

In Hepler v. Washington Mut. Bank, F.A., 2009 WL 1045470 (C.D.Cal. 2009), Judge Snyder held that a mortgage company foreclosing on a home was not subject to either the FDCPA nor the Rosenthal Act, explaining:   To be held liable for violation of the FDCPA, a defendant must-as a threshold requirement-fall within the FDCPA's definition of “debt collector.” See Heintz… Read More

In In re: Saunders, Judge Rodriguez ruled in favor of an auto finance company's claim regarding negative equity financed into an automobile purchase transaction, holding that The Court thus concludes that the hanging paragraph applies to FMC’s claim regardless of whether the charge for negative equity constitutes a purchase-money obligation. Nevertheless, the FMC’s purchase-money security interest encompasses the amount financed for… Read More

In Pickering v. Coast Center for Orthopedic Arthroscopic Surgery, 2009 WL 932629 (2009), the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, in an unpublished decision, reviewed a jury’s finding that an orthopedic doctor’s group was liable under the FDCPA notwithstanding its status as a creditor.  The Court of Appeal affirmed the jury’s finding that the doctor’s group’s retention of… Read More

On January 12, 2009, Paul D. S. Edwards filed a petition with the FCC for an expedited clarification and declaratory ruling regarding the Commission’s rules under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Specifically, Edwards asks the Commission to clarify whether a creditor may place autodialed or prerecorded message calls to a telephone number associated with wireless service that was provided to… Read More

In Okefenokee Aircraft, Inc. v. Primesouth Bank, 2009 WL 724113 (Ga. App. 2009), the Georgia Court of Appeal was asked to address whether the UCC prohibited entry of judgment in favor of a creditor on a contractual balance notwithstanding the fact that the creditor had repossessed, but not yet sold, the collateral.  The Court concluded that “a secured creditor can… Read More

In Allers-Petrus v. Columbia Recovery Group,C08-4433FDB (D.Or. 2009), Judge Burgess held that a debtor's failure to disclose a pending FDCPA claim in her Ch. 13 Bankruptcy schedules judicially estopped her from bringing those claims later in the district court.  Nor could the debtor re-open her bankruptcy to cure the issue.  Judge Burgess explained: Plaintiff Allers-Petrus filed her bankruptcy petition with… Read More

1 229 230 231 232 233 239