Defendant was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in California though he was not an officer of dmarcian USA and demarcian EU, for which he worked, was a separate entity. By publicly presenting himself as a leader of dmarcian, a company headquartered in California, having dmarcian EU’s web address automatically route to dmarcian’s Web site, administered in California, and receiving prospective customers directed to dmarcian EU by a dmarcian employee in California, defendant purposely availed himself . . . of forum benefits and purposefully derive[d] benefit from’ [his] activities in the forum. Plaintiff’s claims arose from those California contacts.