(California lacked personal jurisdiction over the Arab owners of Al Arabiya news service which plaintiff, a Lebanon-resident lawyer, with a house in California, sued for defamation in a news item linking plaintiff to Hezbollah’s leader who allegedly stole and laundered money to fund his potential escape from Lebanon. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. (1984) 465 U.S. 770 did not apply here because none of the defendants had, themselves, engaged in any business contacts with California. Though Al Arabiya was rebroadcast by Dish to the United States generally, there was no evidence that the rebroadcast contract was aimed at California in particular even if that state has the most Arab residents. Hence, Dish’s contacts with California could not be attributed to defendants. Personal jurisdiction could not be established under the Calder v. Jones (1984) 465 U.S. 783 test either because the focus of the defamatory article, the news sources from which it was derived, and the harm plaintiff allegedly suffered were all focused on Lebanon, not California.