This decision holds that an arbitration agreement in an employment contract was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because (1) it did not explain and separately provide for waiver of the employee’s right to sue in court to enforce his individual PAGA claim (as opposed to the non-waivable right to sue under PAGA for the benefit of other employees), and (2) in defining the disputes subject to arbitration, the clause listed as examples only the types of claims an employee would bring, not those an employer might prosecute.  The decision also affirms the trial court’s order staying arbitration under CCP 1281.2(c) as to some plaintiffs who signed enforceable arbitration provisions because other plaintiffs had not signed arbitration agreements or signed unenforceable ones.  Though the enforceable arbitration agreements chose the FAA to govern arbitration the agreements didn’t choose application of the FAA’s procedural provisions, so the CAA’s procedures properly applied.