Following Bates v. Dow Agrosciences (2005) 125 S.Ct. 1788, this decision holds that a state law claim for failure to warn of the dangers of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is not expressly or impliedly preempted by FIFRA. The warning that plaintiff claimed Monsanto should have put on Roundup labels was not in addition to or different from FIFRA’s labeling requirements. Instead, state law paralleled FIFRA’s requirement that the label containing warnings adequate to protect health and the environment. Since Monsanto could have complied with both state and federal law, FIFRA did not impliedly preempt state law.