This decision tries to make sense of arbitration of PAGA claims in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906. It holds that an arbitration clause’s waiver of the right to bring PAGA claims is still unenforceable as against public policy, but that waiver can be severed from the rest of the arbitration clause, leaving the remainder enforceable. Under the severed clause, the employee must arbitrate PAGA claims based on Labor Code violations that the plaintiff suffered. PAGA claims based on violations affecting only other employees are not arbitrable. Noting that federal court interpretations of state law are not binding, the decision holds that the US Supreme Court misinterpreted PAGA, and that an employee once having established PAGA standing on violations affecting the plaintiff, can pursue in court PAGA claims based on violations only other employees.