Calling for en banc review of Monster Energy Co. v. City Beverages, LLC (9th Cir. 2019) 940 F.3d 1130, this decision refuses to extend Monster Energy’s holding.  Disclosure is required only if the arbitrator has a non-trivial ownership interest in JAMS (or other arbitration administrator) and only if JAMS (or other) has non-trivial business dealings with the opposing party–not the opposing party’s counsel.  Also, the arbitrator was not required to issue renewed disclosures when new counsel substituted in because the arbitrator had nothing to disclose regarding the new counsel.