In this case interpreting an old water decree, the court recognizes that use of the disjunctive “or” can, depending on context, mean either “one or the other, but not both” (its exclusive meaning) or “one or the other or both” (its inclusive meaning). Which meaning is to be given “or” depends on the context in which it is used. Here, the water decree allowed use of water for a series of uses joined by “or.” The decision concludes that the intended meaning was inclusive so that water could be used for a combination of the permitted uses.