Plaintiff’s First Amendment and associated claims challenging Meta’s policy of censoring Facebook posts with what Meta considered inaccurate information about COVID or vaccine safety were properly dismissed because plaintiff could not establish that Meta was a government actor. Meta didn’t enforce a state-imposed rule restricting speech, but had its own policy for censoring Facebook posts, its own independent incentives to do so, and exercised its own judgment. There was no evidence Meta agreed with the government or was coerced by the government.