CCP 92(d) states that motions to strike are allowed in limited jurisdiction cases only on the ground that the damages or other relief sought are not supported by the complaint’s allegations. This decision holds that the section precludes a party from filing an Anti-SLAPP motion to strike in a limited jurisdiction case.
California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 3 (Edmon, P.J.); November 7, 2018; 28 Cal. App. 5th 1146