Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its misappropriation of trade secrets claim, but continued to prosecute six other causes of action against defendant. Defendant moved unsuccessfully for an attorney fee award under Civ. Code 3426.4 which allows fee awards for trade secrets claims brought in bad faith. Defendant's appeal from the order denying its fee motion was dismissed. The order was not a… Read More
A provision in an attorney's contingency fee agreement that purported to allow the attorney to consent on the client's behalf (and over the client's objection) to any settlement offer that the attorney thought was reasonable and in the client's best interest violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and was void. Such a provision creates an immediate, direct conflict of interest… Read More
Hom entered into a lease with tenant. The lease granted extensive rights to lenders to tenant, including performing tenant's obligations and assuming its rights under the lease. Tenant sued Hom who cross-complained against tenant and Petrou, a lender to tenant. As part of his settlement with tenant, Hom dismissed his cross-complaint against Petrou as well. Petrou was awarded attorney fees… Read More
Google settled part of a class action, paying some class members $65 million and agreeing to separately pay plaintiffs' attorneys fees as awarded by the court. Plaintiffs' attorneys appealed from the district court's fee award, claiming the district court should have awarded them more based on the common fund theory of fee awards rather than the lower sum it calculated… Read More
In an FEHA case, a prevailing defendant is entitled to ordinary court costs, as well as attorney fees, only in the trial court's discretion which must be exercised under the Christiansburg standard, allowing a fee or cost award to the defendant only when the plaintiff's suit is found to be objectively meritless, frivolous or without foundation. That standard applies to… Read More
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for an attorney fee award on the ground that neither party had prevailed in the action. Plaintiff tenant sued his landlord, asked the jury to award him $200,000 but recovered a jury verdict of only $6,450. In view of plaintiff's recovery of such a small percentage of the… Read More
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deeming plaintiffs the prevailing parties, entitled to an attorney fee award under Civ. Code 5975(c). Plaintiffs sued their homeowners association, claiming it had not complied with the CC&Rs' requirement for homeowner approval in connection with its plan to erect a traffic light at the gate immediately adjacent to plaintiffs' property. After… Read More
Narrowly interpreting and correcting Copenbarger v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism, Inc. (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 1, this decision holds that proof of attorney fees as damages under the tort of another doctrine follows the same rules of proof of other types of expenses as damages. The plaintiff's testimony that she received and paid the bill is sufficient prima facie proof of… Read More
In awarding fees under CCP 425.16, the trial court did not err in using a market rate for the hourly rate rather than the discounted rate that defense attorneys charge high-volume insurance clients. This market rate approach has been applied in cases involving in-house counsel, contingency fees, and pro bono work. The reasonable market rate need not mirror the actual… Read More
When an employee is the prevailing party on claims for minimum or overtime wages, she is entitled to a reasonable attorney fee on the claim pursuant to Lab. Code 1194. That section prevails over Lab. Code 1031, which would otherwise limit the attorney fee to 20% of the recovery if the employee recovers less than $300. The two statutes conflict,… Read More
It is an abuse of discretion in a civil rights or public interest case (such as this Song-Beverly Act case) to deny attorney fees altogether for time spent after the plaintiff rejects a 998 offer, so long as the plaintiff ultimately recovers more than the 998 offered. Though the trial court retains broad discretion to evaluate post-offer attorney fees and… Read More
Plaintiff successfully sued defendant for violating a conservation easement on his property. The trial court awarded plaintiff $2.9 million in attorney fees for five years of hard-fought litigation and a 19-day trial. This decision affirms the award. Plaintiff could recover fees for all hours spent by its attorneys though the first $500,000 in fees was paid for by its insurance. … Read More
The triall court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for an award of fees under CCP 2033.420(a) for proving facts stated in requests for admission that the defendant had wrongly denied. None of the grounds the trial court stated were supported by the evidence. Nor was the plaintiff required to allocate its fees to specific requests that defendant had… Read More
Although California and Indiana both generally enforce spendthrift trusts, the law of both states allow creditors to collect from the trust's assets when required by strong public policy--for example, to pay child support owed by the spendthrift beneficiary. This decision holds that under the law of both states, the trust's assets are accessible to pay attorney fees that an opposing… Read More
In a Longshore & Harbor Workers Compensation Act case, the ALJ abused his discretion in awarding the prevailing claimant attorney fees at an hourly rate that was substantially lower than the rates that the claimant's evidence showed were prevailing rates for attorneys of equal skill in the same market area. Use of historical market rate surveys is a proper means… Read More
In 2007, Congress amended FOIA to partly overrule Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health & Human Resources (2001) 121 S.Ct. 1835 and allow the plaintiff to recover attorney fees on the catalyst theory in FOIA cases. The 2007 amendment allows a FOIA plaintiff to prove eligibility for a fee award by either (a) he… Read More
The federal Fair Housing Act's provision regarding attorney fees and costs must be interpreted like 42 U.S.C. 1988. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (1978) applies. A prevailing defendant cannot recover either attorney fees or costs without showing that the suit was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless. Read More
Gov. Code 91003 allows an attorney fee award to the prevailing party in an action seeking injunctive relief to enjoin violations or to compel compliance with the provisions of the Political Reform Act. This case holds that the statute does not pit impecunious plaintiffs against well-healed defendants. So, the prevailing party standard adopted in Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (1994) 510… Read More
Probate Code 2640.1 allows a trial court to award attorney fees against the estate of the conservatee and in favor of the person who petitioned for appointment of a conservator if the court appoints a conservator different from the one the petitioner requested. Here, however, the conservatorship petition was dismissed in a settlement before any conservator was appointed. In that… Read More
When an attorney sues a client for attorney fees under an express or implied in fact contract for non-contingent fees that satisfies the requirements of Bus. & Prof. Code 6148, the attorney is entitled to the agreed fees even if they exceed a "reasonable fee" set by the lodestar plus multiplier method--so long as the fees and fee agreement are… Read More
