Areas of Practice
Education
Mr. Dykstra's primary areas of legal practice include:
Commercial litigation with an emphasis on financial institution litigation and creditors’ rights.
Mr. Dykstra's specific experience includes:
Financial Institution Litigation: Representation of financial institutions, primarily mortgage lenders, loan servicers, and auto finance companies, in suits raising a variety of lender liability claims. Prosecution of lenders’ suits to collect loans and enforce loan agreements
Consumer Bankruptcy: Representation of automotive finance companies and mortgage lenders in consumer bankruptcy cases of Chapter 7, 11 and 13 debtors.
Lender Liability: Defended various financial institutions in individual actions involving allegations of fraud, wrongful termination, wrongful foreclosure, inadequate disclosures, wrongful acceptance and processing of checks and financial instruments, and discriminatory/predatory lending practices.
Biographical Information:
Employment History: Joined Severson & Werson in 2008
Education:
Biola University (B.A., 2004)
University of Virginia (J.D., 2008)
Admitted to Practice:
Admitted to Practice in State Courts of California and Nevada; U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Central, Eastern and Southern Districts of California; U.S. District Court for Nevada; United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Professional Affiliations: State Bar of California; Orange County Bar Association; Orange County Bar Association and Association of Trial Lawyers; American Bar Association.
Represented lenders and servicers in wrongful foreclosure actions.
Represented a major automobile manufacturer in employment litigation.
Represented lender in litigation to recover amounts under defaulted loans, and defend claims of misrepresentation and slander.
Represented financial institutions in litigation regarding their processing of checks or other instruments from dishonest bookkeepers.
Represented and obtained summary judgment for a major financial institution in a matter of first impression regarding interpretation of its deposit agreement provisions.